The Fiscal Responsibility Of Business Ethics In The Privacy Debate

July 29th, 2010 by Mike May

Privacy and public policy are in the trades again. Every few years the topic of online privacy becomes important on Capitol Hill, so I wrote about it in my column in MediaPost this month. The debate ostensibly impacts us as email marketers, and it also may impact us as consumers. How then should we regard pending privacy legislation – as a threat to our current business practices, a chance for a more level playing field, an inevitable market correction, some relief for our own personal inboxes? All of the above, potentially. I approach email marketing from the consumer’s perspective: do right by your audience and the ROI will take care of itself. If there’s a public outcry about online privacy, I sure hope fingers are pointing at my competitors, and not me.

The Fiscal Responsibility of Business Ethics in the Privacy Debate
by Mike May
Published on 7.28.2010 in MediaPost’s Email Insider.

Public policy has become topical in the email industry again. The last time online privacy was as common as part of the vernacular on Capitol Hill was leading up to the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. In 2003 legitimate email marketers were the beneficiaries of the legislation, though the impact of the current go-round on email marketers is up for debate. The current proposed legislation — in particular the bill set forth by Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Ill) — puts forth a “universal opt-out program,” a sort of do-not-call list for email and other personally identifiable information collected online. If passed, this will change the way many law-abiding business operate, and would very likely hamstring many list rental and lead generation businesses. It could also have ramifications for trade-outs and co-promotions, as sending email to a house list on behalf of another company could fall into a grey area and raise the specter of lawsuits.

Frankly, we shouldn’t give a rat’s whisker about the legislation — CAN-SPAM, the Rush Bill, the Boucher Bill or any of the next bills to tumble down Capitol Hill. As email marketers who simply want to continue a dialogue with our customers and subscribers, shouldn’t we already be Beyond Reproach?

Think of Beyond Reproach as the kinder, more thoughtful cousin of self-regulation. If you self-regulate as a driver, for example, you might catch yourself tapping your brakes when you see a police car hiding in the weeds ahead. If you’re Beyond Reproach, you drive at the speed limit — not because you’re purposely abiding by the law, but because you genuinely believe that 55 mph is a safe and reasonable speed to travel. Staying within the law is coincidental to you. Drivers like this are the most laudable citizens of the highway.

As email professionals who devote enough energy to our craft that we read the best practices in the trades and attend the most highly regarded conferences, shouldn’t we be the most laudable citizens of the email industry? Shouldn’t we be the group that the laws aren’t meant to restrict, but whose business practices the laws seek to standardize?

Here is how Beyond Reproach would look in practice:

List Rental or Co-Promotion: A client of my company’s promotes conferences through media partners, which normally has them exchanging some exposure at the conference for email rights to the media company’s subscriber lists. But this year a proposed partner asked my client for the same rights, in order to promote an offer to the client’s subscriber base. My client refused, citing the integrity of his company’s list as the reason. But then company principals continued to reflect and realized their willingness to compromise their media partners’ list integrity reflected as poorly on them as it did on the partner. So they made a policy change to no longer send direct or sponsored emails to partners’ lists, regardless of the permissions granted by the subscribers. That’s good email citizenship.

Exceptions to Subscriber Preferences: Clients often set up preferences centers but want to reserve the right to email their subscribers independent of the lists they have selected for themselves. The most common reasons are unanticipated communication needs, the launch of new newsletters or content streams, or special announcements. Advising these clients is done with a single word: discipline. Rather than thinking of your list as an asset to leverage as you see fit, think of it instead as a media property you have some limited access to merchandise within. Once you turn preferences over to your subscribers, your role changes from list owner to content publisher. If you have a new newsletter you need to promote or an announcement you need to make, think about how you would include this content within your existing messages, instead of writing and sending separate messages that necessarily ignore (or at least stretch) subscriber preferences.

Opt-Out: Read DJ Waldow’s column on this very topic from a couple of weeks ago. He outlines a scenario where an email marketer is within the law, but not Beyond Reproach. With the “Universal Opt-Out” provision in the current Rush Bill, this grey area is going to have a lot of light throw on it in the near future. And DJ’s argument is even more cogent than mine. He argues not from a position of business ethics, but simple fiscal responsibility: “making assumptions and sending customers emails they have not asked for (opt-out) tends to be a combination that can be deadly.”

I don’t mean to open up a can of flames about the current proposed legislation. I’m sure there are some aspects of it that some readers of this column object to, and there are likely provisions that could impact how my company and/or our clients conduct some parts of our business. So yes, we’ll stay current with it and follow the laws if passed. But the fact that privacy is on the Hill again should be a wake-up call that as an industry, we are not currently Beyond Reproach. Yes, your list is an asset, and you have the right to profit from that asset. But is it a more valuable asset than your company’s reputation? As competition intensifies, aren’t likability and integrity more meaningful differentiators than list size or trailing quarterly revenue?

And as a professional and an organization, is your energy best spent defending established tactics shared by yourself and all competitors in light of a rapidly evolving environment, or is it wiser to devote your resources towards innovations that differentiate you and forge newer and stronger connections with your subscribers?

I believe acting Beyond Reproach is a path toward long-term prosperity, despite the occasional near-term compromises it requires. And every time I’m pulled away from thinking about the fun possibilities in email innovation to read 55 pages of privacy legislation, I’m further convinced.

Metrics to Analyze Content, Copy and Engagement

July 22nd, 2010 by Tom Pines

mmay150x150

post from Mike May, Real Magnet’s Director of Insights

I talk a lot about engagement, not just because it’s going to start impacting deliverability, but also because engagement is the primary objective of most email programs. You send email because there is a connection between your organization and a subscriber, and you wish to nurture that connection. The desired end result is usually some action – registering for a conference or webinar, downloading a research report or white paper, participating in a survey, or consuming some relevant content online. But when your subscribers take these actions they are exhibiting the engagement your email strives to foster.

Alas, not all of your subscribers take each action you present to them in every one of your emails. Fortunately, there are other ways to measure how engaged they are – and how engaging your emails are – independent of the results of your message’s primary call-to-action. Here are a few metrics to employ to evaluate how engaging your email program is:

1. Open Rate. Open rate is typically used to evaluate the effectiveness of subject lines. But syntax aside, open rate also measures a very important component of engagement: anticipation. Your subscribers are more likely to open an email from you if they are expecting it and looking forward to receiving it (and any subscriber looking forward to receiving your email certainly qualifies as engaged). How do you tell which part of open rate measures the effectiveness of your subject lines, and which measures engagement? It’s impossible to pinpoint one from the other, but you can find some clues. If your open rate doesn’t move much, despite very different subject lines from message to message and even A/B testing within the same message, your score is probably more a reflection of your engagement than what’s actually in the subject line itself.

2. Click-to-Open. The number of click-throughs (or “Links” in your Real Magnet reporting) measures the number of message recipients who clicked on one or more links. Your click-through rate (or Link %) is that quantity divided by the total number of delivered messages. What this measures is the size and shape of the funnel, from your universe of recipients down to the success of the call-to-action. But while click-throughs are evidence of engagement, this metric doesn’t measure how engaging your messages actually are. A better metric is click-to-open, or the percentage of the people who opened your email who went on to click something in it. Only the people who open and read your email can judge whether or not your content is compelling.

For example, let’s say Company A sends its newsletter to 10,000 people. It gets a 50% open rate and a 5% click-through rate, for 500 links. Company B also sends to 10,000 subscribers, and gets a 20% open rate and a 2.5% click-through rate for 250 links.

Image 213

Company A got double the click-through rate, but because its open rate was much higher, it had a larger universe of subscribers who saw the content in the first place and were in a position to click on it. Company A’s Click-to-Open rate is 10%. Despite Company B’s lower click-through rate, it had a Click-to-Open rate of 12.5%. Company A’s open rate could be evidence of a stronger relationship with its subscribers and greater anticipation, but Company B’s content is more compelling – pulling more of the people who read it to take action.

3. Unique and Gross Clicks.

The number of “Links” reported by Real Magnet Overview Tracking Page is the number of people who clicked on one or more links within your message. You can drill down into your Links metrics to see these Unique Clicks (the total number of clicks excluding multiple clicks of the same link) and also Gross Clicks (the total number of clicks including multiple clicks of the same link).

Real Magnet Link Tracking

In the example above, Company A might find that its 500 recipients who clicked through actually generated 600 Unique Clicks and 700 Gross Clicks. That means that many of its subscribers were reading the email, clicked through, and then returned to the email to either click on something else, or to click again on the same link later on. The larger the difference between the number of Links and the Unique and Gross Clicks, the better your content is working to compel action from your recipients.

4. Social Clicks.

If your message includes links to follow your organization in social channels like Facebook and Twitter, or links to Real Magnet’s SWYN (Share With Your Network) feature, the activity around these social icons can also telegraph engagement. The easiest way to get a sense of the effectiveness of these icons within your message is to use Click-View tracking, which is linked by the thumbnail of your message on the top level of Message Tracking. You’ll see how many clicks the Facebook and Twitter and other social icons attract.

Z_social

Activity here is evidence of your most engaged subscribers, as they are the ones who are most likely to forge a connection with your organization in addition to the email, or pass along something you’ve sent to their friends and colleagues.

5. Recipient Level Tracking. You can run extremely informative reports with Recipient Level Tracking. One of my favorites to measure engagement is to quantify the number of subscribers who click-through emails on a regular basis. Customize a report to show how many recipients have clicked 2, 3, 4, 5 or more times in the past 10 messages, and compare these quantities to your total subscriber base. Very quickly you’ll have a sense of how large your most active and engaged population is. You can even drill down into these reports to identify who these subscribers are, to target them for other high-engagement campaigns. (There is an added cost for recipient level tracking because of the costs associated with keeping such a high volume of data available and current for immediate reporting. Contact your account manager for details.)

What You Need to Know About Block Lists Before You’re Blocked

July 20th, 2010 by Andrew Barett

If you’re sending high volumes of e-mail, chances are that you’ll find yourself on a block list sooner or later. The secret to surviving (and correcting) a listing is to be ready before it happens. Here’s what you need to know now, before you find yourself listed.

Stay Cool. No one ever got a listing removed by screaming down a phone line or threatening legal action. Don’t expect (or demand) a good customer service experience from a block list – you are not their customer.

Block Lists Don’t Block Mail. In the initial panic following the discovery of your listing, it’s easy to forget that block lists don’t actually block any mail; it’s your recipients’ mail servers that do all the blocking. The filters used by many ISPs and companies reference data from block list, reputation scoring firms, and especially feedback from their customers to inform their filtering decisions.

Some Block Lists Matter More Than Others. The vast majority of public block lists don’t matter at all. There are plenty of web sites that offer to look up your sending IP on hundreds of lists all at once, but unless you’re listed on one of only about a half-dozen, you probably have nothing to worry about.

So which are the ones worth worrying about? Any of the lists operated by Spamhaus.org, the CBL, URIBL, CloudMark CSI, SpamCop, Barracuda Central, and sometimes SURBL and SORBS. The cast of characters changes a little from time to time, but these are usually the heavy lifters.

Different Lists Do Different Things. A listing on the Spamhaus SBL means something very different from a listing on URIBL, which is entirely different again from a listing on Spamhaus PBL. Only one of these (SBL) is a list of suspected spam sources. The URIBL lists domains that appear in spam. The PBL is a list of IP space from which unauthenticated e-mail is not supposed to be sent. Don’t assume you’ve been listed because someone thinks you’re sending spam; make sure you understand the reason for your listing before you waste time fixing a problem you don’t have.

Many Block Lists are Automated. Some block lists operate with as little human input as possible. The URIBL is a good example. It automatically adds the domains it sees in the links contained in spam, so that users of the list can block mail based on presence of those domains. The good news is that delisting is pretty straightforward – just submit a short request on their web site. But expect the listing to be reinstated automatically if it sees more spam that contains links to the offending domain.

Avoid the Death of A Thousand Cuts. The most dangerous block lists are the private, home-grown lists created and maintained by IT professionals at the companies you’re sending to.  These lists are unpublished, unqueriable, and are controlled by harried mail administrators who don’t have time to check every few weeks to see if it’s okay to delist you..

Imagine a temp firm that specializes in the placement of legal secretaries with medium and small law offices. They may not be sending a lot in overall volume, but if the temp firm is listed by just a few of their target customers, the impact on deliverability will be noticeable. Once they’re on one of these lists, the affect is very localized, but very difficult to reverse. As the number of listings at individual law offices grows, the temp firm may find their target market is all but inaccessible to them via the e-mail channel.

Ironically, one of the benefits to senders of the large, centralized block lists is that it takes just one delisting to get mail unblocked across great swathes of the Internet. It’s a lot easier than contacting every domain you send to, one by one.

Block lists seem a lot less scary once you understand how they’re assembled and used. If you find yourself listed, keep calm, find out why, and gather the data together you need to fix it. At Real Magnet, we have deliverability professionals ready to manage the process for you, and even help prevent a listing in the first place.

Andrew Barrett is Sr. Director, ISP Relations & Deliverability at Real Magnet.

Autosave, Session Restore Now Live in Real Magnet!

July 19th, 2010 by Michael Al-Megdad

For various reasons, some of you have lost message content while working in Real Magnet. We realize how frustrating this is and have made changes to reduce, if not eliminate, these occurrences. Specifically, autosave and a process for recovering content upon accidental log out has been added to Real Magnet.

Autosave Feature

As the name implies, the new autosave feature automatically saves your content. It does so every two minutes. By default, autosave is off. To enable it, simply select the “on” option from the autosave pull-down menu in the upper left corner of the WYSIWYG editor. Autosave is currently enabled with our WYSIWYG blank templates and not with Active Preview, Copy/Paste or our Plug and Play templates. This setting is defined on a user basis (i.e. you can have it on and your colleague can have it off) and Real Magnet will remember your setting each time you log in.

Auto-Save Screen

You’ll also notice that when content is saved (either manually by clicking the Save button or via autosave), it does so in a more seamless fashion. Before, you’d see the entire edit page refresh. Now, instead, you’ll see the language in the “Save” button change to “Saving…” And perhaps more importantly, a “Last Saved” time stamp is displayed adjacent to the “Save” button showing the last point in time at which the content was saved.

Session Recovery

The second part of the upgrade is a process for protecting your content against accidental log outs. Previously, if you were logged out, you’d be thrown back to the log in page and any content that wasn’t saved was lost. With this enhancement, our system will detect that you are no longer logged in and will guide you through the process of logging back in, WITHOUT LEAVING THE EDITING PAGE! You’ll be logged in on the editing page where you can immediately save your content and go back to work.  Just follow the steps outlined in the screen shots below to restore your session.

Step 1: Session Log out/Expiration Screen

A pop up window will appear notifying you that you’ve been accidentally logged out.  Select the Click “here” link in Step 1.

Session Restore First

Step 2: Log in Screen

Enter your log in information in the pop-up window.

Session Restore 23

Step 3: Return and Close Session Log out/Expiration Screen

You’re taken back to the Session Log out/Expiration Screen.  Close it by clicking the “x” in the upper right corner.

Session Restore First

Step 4: Save Your Work!

Once back at the editor, SAVE YOUR WORK and you’re good to go. With Autosave and Session Restore, your message and hard work is well protected.

Step 33

If you have any questions about this upgrade, please contact us at support@realmagnet.com or call 301-652-5074.

– End of tutorial –

Let Your Free Flag Fly!

July 15th, 2010 by Andrew Barett

By Andrew Barrett Senior Director, ISP Relations & Deliverability

A long time ago, someone put forth the plausible-sounding notion that the use of certain words in e-mail will trip all kinds of spam alarms at the recipients’ ISP and get mail blocked. That might have been true for a few weeks in 1996, but it certainly isn’t now; ISPs today rely far more on sender reputation when they make delivery decisions. Nonetheless, there still seems to be a significant amount of superstition regarding content filtering.

I have a friend whom I’ll call Christine (since that’s her name). She’s a brilliant, energetic, one-person social media consulting firm, and she sends terrific mail – pithy, engaging, with great voice and compelling offers. But she insists on misspelling (or “munging”) the word “free” in her creative to put the spin move on content filters. “F.R.E.E. 5-Part E-Course”, “Fr*ee Teleseminar”, and “a half-hour of F-RE-E consulting” were all on offer in her last send. I tried to talk her out of mangling her creative a few months ago, but like some some habits, superstitions die hard.

That’s not to say that ISPs don’t perform some types of content filtering – they do, but not in the way Christine and others think. ISPs look at links in the body of the e-mail to catch two species of spam in particular: “phishers”, who are trying to collect log-in credentials for, say, on-line banking or social media accounts; and spam that sends clicks through to web sites that will surreptitiously load a worm, a virus, or other malware onto the computers of unsuspecting visitors.

Many ISPs and private inbound mail servers use a content filtering package called Spam Assassin. Spam Assassin assigns a cumulative score to the content of an e-mail message based on a wide range of criteria, all of which are highly configurable by the servers’ owners. If the score crosses a threshold – which is also configurable by the owner – the message might be rejected as spam based on content. But since the score is cumulative and weighted, the presence or absence of any single word – like “Free!” – is not sufficient to block mail.

The take-away: senders with good reputation shouldn’t feel hampered by content filters when assembling their creative. Senders should feel free to use the language they need to present  the sharpest offer possible. Real Magnet offers it’s customers the opportunity to test their e-mail messages against Spam Assassin before the send, so our customers can test how effective their message is likely to be. It’s just one in a set of great deliverability tools we offer.

The Day After: 24-hour Post-Email Analytics

July 13th, 2010 by Mike May

The upside to email marketing is that the performance data and analytics are so abundant that it’s possible to measure almost any aspect of your messages and campaigns. But the challenge inherent to that upside is that with so much available data, it’s often difficult to know where – or when – to start.

So let’s solve that right now. The “when” is 24 hours after you send each message. The “where” is in the Track module within MagnetMail. Here are 5 analytics in 5 minutes to make you a savvier email marketer with your very next message:

Log into your MagnetMail account and go to Track right up there at the top. Click on the header for the Date Sent column – that arranges your messages chronologically, with the most recent at the top. (MagnetMail will remember this setting and default to it next time.) Double-click yesterday’s message to open its analytics.

1. Take in the data and bars in the Message Sent Results. Look first at the rates for deliverability, open and click-through. They won’t tell you anything today, but do this after every message and you’ll start to see trends. It’s like weighing yourself in the morning. Today you have a single data point. Is this good news or not? The question is best answered by the direction you’re trending, not your current status. Start to learn those trends. See which way you’re headed.

2. Now look at the absolute numbers for Opens, Links and Unsubscribes. Think about what these numbers mean with respect to your objectives. For example, if you want 1000 people to attend your conference and you are emailing your full house list, are the 700 opens and 150 click-throughs encouraging results because they’re part of a larger campaign, or cause to start looking for ways to grow your house list? Rates and percentages are great because they normalize the data, but applying some real-world context to absolute numbers in your analytics is just as vital.

3. Next to the Bounced rate is a little green table. Click it to see how your bounces are categorized. If you don’t already know the different categories, familiarize yourself with what they mean by clicking on the link for each Bounced Type. MagnetMail automatically resends bounces multiple times in the hours following your message and once more overnight. But sometimes the problems that lead to Generic Soft bounces aren’t resolved immediately so resending these bounces the next day is a good idea. Uncheck all the Bounced Types except the Generic Soft. Then click Resend Bounces to try reaching this group with your message again. (I’ll address the other bounce types later, but it doesn’t hurt to look at the actual lists of your different bounced types now as well.)

4. Return to your Message Send Results. Next to the bar chart you’ve been looking at is a thumbnail image of your message. Below the thumbnail is a link to Click-view. Click it – it’s awesome. You’ll see where on the message your readers are clicking, giving you and idea of what impact content, language and even position within the message have on click-throughs. If you see strong clicks even well below the fold, for example, you’ll know that your entire message is being read. If they’re all concentrated at the top, consider shorter copy. Are there long copy blocks without any links? Could you add some to convert some of that attention into action? Do this with every email and you’ll see rapid improvements in your copywriting and layout skills.

5. Return again to the top level of your message’s analytics. Below Message Send Results is Domain Level Tracking. Click on Delivered to sort the domains in this list from lowest delivery rate to highest. It’s not uncommon for emailers – particularly B2B and associations – to have some domains with deliverability rates well below the message’s average. If you see some domains in this list with a Delivered percentage at 30 or more points lower than your Total Delivered percentage, it could signal a blacklist issue at that domain. If you are a B2B emailer you probably know people at that organization. Have them put you in touch with the organization’s email administrator, who can help you resolve the deliverability issues that are preventing your messages from reaching a large percentage of that domain’s audience.

These 5 steps are at the very top level of Real Magnet’s analytics capabilities. You can go much deeper into analytics than the top level of message tracking we’re looking at here. But if you spend just 5 minutes on these steps the day after you send each message, you’ll start to see the trends that can improve your emails almost immediately. Gain comfort with these and it won’t be long before you’re ready for deeper dives into tracking and reporting.

Mobile Phones as Payment Powerhouse

July 7th, 2010 by Michael Al-Megdad

Real Magnet is gearing up to release a mobile tool kit that provides a mobile web version of your message, mobile tracking analytics and enhanced mobile email deliverability testing.  The mobile field is dynamic and innovating in many diverse areas.  In David Gammel’s piece below, he explains how your cellphone might eventually become your mobile wallet. Stay tuned to Real Insights to learn more about our upcoming mobile release!

We’ve already seen music players and cameras merging with the cellular phone over the past several years. The wallet is not too far behind.

Mobile phones in Europe and Asia are very commonly used like a check card is in the U.S.: a simple and easy way to pay for daily goods and services. Internet connected smart phones allow the devices to be plugged directly into banking or simply charge the payment to the mobile account. It’s like being able to make calls with an American Express card.

In the United States, the American Red Cross drive to raise relief money in response to the Haiti earthquake (which raised millions of dollars in just days with no advertising campaign) is a peek into the future of how organizations will raise funds and collect payments for many goods, services and causes.

A few things to consider about this coming change in the U.S. market:

Mobile communication strategies are critical for driving mobile payments. How will you drive messaging and next actions to the mobile devices of your best members or constituents?
Conferences and trade shows are likely to be key areas for driving impulse payments. Mobile payments allows immediate action even while strolling down an exhibit hall alley.
Your technology and banking infrastructure will need to be prepared for this form of payment and will need to be flexible to take advantage of rapidly evolving technology and purchasing behavior.

By C. David Gammel, CAE, president of High Context Consulting and author of the book, “Online and On Mission: Practical Web Strategy for Breakthrough Results.” You may contact David at david@highcontext.com.

New Measures Will Protect Against Content Loss

June 30th, 2010 by Michael Al-Megdad

For various reasons, some of you have lost message content while working in Real Magnet. We realize how frustrating this is and are adding new functionality to reduce, if not eliminate, these occurrences.  Specifically, we’re adding an autosave feature and a process for recovering content should you get logged out. These features will be coming soon.

Autosave Feature

As the name implies, the new autosave feature automatically saves your content. It does so every two minutes.  By default, autosave is off. To enable it, simply select the “on” option from the autosave pull-down menu in the upper left corner of the WYSIWYG editor. Autosave is currently enabled with our WYSIWYG blank templates and not with Active Preview, Copy/Paste or our Plug and Play templates.   This setting is defined on a user basis (i.e. you can have it on and your colleague can have it off) and Real Magnet will remember your setting each time you log-in.

autosave

You’ll also notice that when content is saved (either manually by clicking the Save button or via autosave), it does so in a more seamless fashion. Before, you’d see the entire edit page refresh. Now instead, you’ll see the language in the “Save” button change to “Saving…” And perhaps more importantly, a “Last Saved” time stamp is displayed adjacent to the “Save” button showing the last point in time the content was saved.

Session Recovery

The second part of the upgrade is a process for protecting your content against accidental log outs.  Previously if you were logged out, you’d be thrown back to the log in page and any content that wasn’t saved was lost.  With this enhancement, our system will detect that you are no longer logged in and will guide you through the process of re-logging WITHOUT LEAVING THE EDITING PAGE!  You’ll be logged in back on the editing page where you can immediately save your content and go back to work.

If you have any questions about this upgrade, please contact us at support@realmagnet.com or call 301-652-5074.

From ‘You’ve Got Mail’ To ‘Inbox Zero’

June 30th, 2010 by Mike May

Merlin Mann is the quirkily charismatic force behind 43folders.com, a popular blog about unlocking creativity and productivity. One of the concepts he floated a few years back is called “Inbox Zero” and is about developing a process to manage email as soon as it comes in, so that the weight of your inbox is no longer a burden. Now he’s writing a book on the topic, which means a publisher somewhere thinks “Inbox Zero” is an idea that is ready for prime time. Put another way, someone whose job it is to find and publish books that sell millions of copies thinks “Inbox Zero” fits the bill and will make the publishing company (and the publisher) piles of money. I’ve followed “Inbox Zero” for a while. You can too, on its website. I agree with the book’s publisher that it’s a potentially explosive idea, so my article for MediaPost this week is about how to prepare for an Inbox Zero world. You can read it in full below or over on the MediaPost site.

From ‘You’ve Got Mail’ To ‘Inbox Zero’
by Mike May
published on 6.30.10 in MediaPost’s Email Insider

In 1998, the Tom Hanks/Meg Ryan romantic comedy “You’ve Got Mail” was released. Buoyed by an infectious consumer enthusiasm over the freshness and marvel of instantaneous person-to-person electronic communication, the film grossed a quarter of a billion dollars at the box office. If you’re in the email industry, you don’t just remember the late ’90s; you pine for them. People (they were just “people” then, not consumers or subscribers or — gasp — segments) genuinely liked getting email.

Fast-forward to 2010. Merlin Mann, the productivity champion behind the popular 43folders.com blog, has a book called “Inbox Zero” due out this year. The book springs from some articles Mann originally wrote for 43folders.com, which he spun into a presentation he delivers at companies across the country. One of these was at Google, and the hour-long video of his talk has been viewed over 300,000 times.

“Inbox Zero” claims powerfully to be “about how to reclaim your email, your attention, and your life.” Says Mann, “Just remember that every email you read, re-read, and re-re-re-re-re-read as it sits in that big dumb pile is actually incurring mental debt on your behalf. The interest you pay on email you’re reluctant to deal with is compounded every day and, in all likelihood, it’s what’s led you to feeling like such a useless slacker today.” Like a good email marketer, Mann regards attention as the dearest of commodities. But his energy is channeled towards protecting that attention from intruding email, rather than capturing it: “Give each message as much attention as it needs and not one iota more. Remember the contextuality of triage: if you keep trying to care for dead and doomed patients, you’ll end up losing a lot of the ones who could have actually used your help.”

“Inbox Zero” teaches citizens of the Internet a process for managing inbound email so that it ultimately becomes less of a burden, and more of a communications channel. It’s a self-help book, which means it has the potential to be wildly successful. If a quarter of a billion dollars worth of movie audiences were enraptured by the thought of inbox romance in 1998, how large to you think the prospective audience for a book about help with email will be today? (Hint: it’s a number larger than your house file.)

If the book and the concept of  “Inbox Zero” do catch fire (I believe they will), the rules for email engagement will tighten down even further. The net result will be comparable to many of the other changes the industry has faced, from spam filters to engagement-based metrics. The gulf between successful, legitimate, disciplined, honorable emailers — and those who are, well, not — will continue to grow.

What does your organization need to do now to get on the right side of that chasm? Here are the attributes that I believe will distinguish the email haves from the have-nots in an Inbox Zero world:

Respect: Increasingly, people are going to be putting energy into developing and maintaining the processes to balance email with the rest of their lives. Email marketers should look at the soft drink companies for some guidance here. Faced with the movement towards weight management and healthier lifestyles, the soft drink companies tried first to make it even easier to get a soda, through aggressive promotions, partnerships with (and funding for) schools to get vending machines installed, and aggressive sponsorship and brand promotion. The smarter and more recent approach is to swim the current, not against it. Soft drink companies today have diversified by offering fruit juices, sports drinks and fortified water. Emailers need to take the long view toward harmonious coexistence within new inbox lifestyles. Respect the process your subscribers are trying to implement, instead of focusing all your energy toward trying to disrupt it.

Relevance: As the premium on attention increases, relevance and anticipation become the preferred currency. The best advice I can offer on that front is to point out that the best advice is already out there. Reread every article you’ve ever seen on relevance.

Brevity: There is a pat response in the direct marketing industry to the question about how much copy a marketing communication should contain: “It should be as long as you can still hold your audience’s attention.” After “Inbox Zero,” that’s bunk. It’s a very selfish mentality for marketers to believe they’re entitled to all the attention they can grab. It takes a short view and disrespects the consumer’s process. Attention is finite, so any excesses garnered by a single emailer come at the expense not just of competitors but of the reader’s ultimate objectives. “Inbox Zero” is very good news for disciplined emailers, so encouraging its adoption should supersede monopolizing inbox attention.

Humility: Mann points out that the reason email carries such psychic weight is because it is out of our control. We cannot choose who sends us email, how many we receive or — importantly — the expectations of the senders. The result is that the entire inbox feels urgent, and “getting through” the inbox quickly becomes a manic preoccupation. Successful emailers in an Inbox Zero world will cede control to consumers, giving them broader options for managing their subscriptions: preferences centers, “lite” subscriptions, subscribing through alternate channels such as RSS, mobile or even Twitter can and should be offered.

If “Inbox Zero” arrived today, which side of the gulf would your company be on? If you regard it as an opportunity, you’re likely already in position. But if you see it as a threat, you’ve got some hard work in front of you.

The Increasing Importance of Mobile Email

June 29th, 2010 by Michael Al-Megdad

6-29-2010 10-07-41 AM

A study from Litmus has shown that the iPhone’s email client already ranks in at number 5 with a 4% market share of the total email client environment. This is indicative of a broader shift of how recipients are viewing email messages. The iPhones mail client is already within the top 10 email clients after 3 years of being on the market.  With the successful launch of Apple’s iPhone 4, it is a sure bet the iPhone’s email client will rise higher on this list as time goes on.  As phone manufactures shift their resources into this area of the cell phone market and more consumers purchase smartphones we’ll see many other mobile inboxes competing in the top 10 clients.